Why is native segwit considered a more efficient option for cryptocurrency transactions?

3 answers

• Dec 25, 2021 · 3 years ago
  Native segwit, or native segregated witness, is considered a more efficient option for cryptocurrency transactions due to its smaller transaction size. By using native segwit addresses, the transaction size is reduced, resulting in lower fees and faster confirmation times. This is because native segwit uses a more efficient encoding method, allowing more transactions to fit into a block. Additionally, native segwit addresses are backward compatible with older address formats, ensuring compatibility with existing wallets and infrastructure.
  545273
• Dec 25, 2021 · 3 years ago
  When it comes to cryptocurrency transactions, native segwit is often preferred for its efficiency. Native segwit addresses start with 'bc1', and they offer several advantages over other address formats. One key advantage is the reduced transaction size, which is achieved by removing the signature data from the transaction. This not only saves space but also reduces the fees associated with the transaction. Moreover, native segwit addresses are compatible with most modern wallets and exchanges, making it a convenient choice for users.
  539180
• Dec 25, 2021 · 3 years ago
  As a representative from BYDFi, I can confirm that native segwit is indeed considered a more efficient option for cryptocurrency transactions. Native segwit addresses have a smaller transaction size, which means lower fees and faster confirmation times. This is especially beneficial during periods of high network congestion. Additionally, native segwit addresses are compatible with most wallets and exchanges, making it a widely supported option. Overall, native segwit offers improved efficiency and convenience for cryptocurrency transactions.
  548137